Denoc Formulation

Definition

The Decoupled Natural Orthogonal Complement (DeNOC) is a velocity-transformation method for
deriving the equations of motion of a serial (or branched) multibody chain from the Newton–Euler
equations, due to Saha and extending the Natural Orthogonal Complement of Angeles & Lee. A
velocity-transformation matrix maps the generalized joint rates
to the stacked link twists , and is factored into a lower
block-triangular factor (twist propagation along the chain) and a block-diagonal
factor (per-joint motion subspaces). Premultiplying the stacked Newton–Euler
equations by annihilates the non-contributing (constraint)
wrenches and collapses the system to the minimal generalized equations of motion, yielding a
recursive algorithm for the generalized inertia and convective-inertia matrices.
In virgili-llop2016spacecraft the DeNOC is applied to a
spacecraft-plus-arm with the base appended as link , so the same formulation serves both a
free-flying and a free-floating base
— the regime is set by how (base
twist) is driven or left free, not by the DeNOC machinery itself.

Key Equations

Symbols per notation.md.

Velocity transformation and its decoupling (Eqs. 16–17; the source writes the DeNOC matrix
renamed here to avoid clashing with the null-space projector
in notation.md):

\boldsymbol N_{\mathrm{voc}} = \boldsymbol N_l\,\boldsymbol N_d .$$ Projection of the stacked Newton–Euler equations $\boldsymbol M_{\mathrm{NE}}\dot{\boldsymbol t}+\dot{\boldsymbol M}_{\mathrm{NE}}\boldsymbol t=\boldsymbol w$ onto the joint space removes the non-contributing wrenches ($\boldsymbol N_{\mathrm{voc}}^\top\boldsymbol w^{n}=0$), giving the generalized equations of motion (Eqs. 38–40): $$\boldsymbol M\,\ddot{\boldsymbol q} + \boldsymbol C\,\dot{\boldsymbol q} = \boldsymbol\tau,\qquad \boldsymbol M = \boldsymbol N_{\mathrm{voc}}^\top \boldsymbol M_{\mathrm{NE}}\,\boldsymbol N_{\mathrm{voc}},\qquad \boldsymbol C = \boldsymbol N_{\mathrm{voc}}^\top\!\left(\boldsymbol M_{\mathrm{NE}}\dot{\boldsymbol N}_{\mathrm{voc}} + \dot{\boldsymbol M}_{\mathrm{NE}}\boldsymbol N_{\mathrm{voc}}\right).$$ The block-stacked link-mass operator $\boldsymbol M_{\mathrm{NE}}=\mathrm{blkdiag}(\boldsymbol M_0,\dots,\boldsymbol M_n)$ is the source's $M$; the resulting **generalized inertia is the canonical $\boldsymbol M$ of [notation.md](../notation.md)** (the source labels it $H$). The base–arm coupling appears as the off-diagonal block (Eq. 44): $$\boldsymbol M = \begin{bmatrix}\boldsymbol M_0 & \boldsymbol M_{0m}\\ \boldsymbol M_{0m}^\top & \boldsymbol M_m\end{bmatrix}.$$ ## Source Support - [virgili-llop2016spacecraft](../sources/virgili-llop2016spacecraft.md) — derives the DeNOC twist propagation, the $\boldsymbol N_l\boldsymbol N_d$ factorization, and the $\mathcal{O}(n)$ recursive forms of $\boldsymbol M$ and $\boldsymbol C$ for a spacecraft-with-arm; states explicitly that the same SPART formulation handles a *flying* or a *floating* base. ## Related Topics - [ffsm_dynamics](ffsm_dynamics.md) — the DeNOC is one route to assemble the FFSM equations of motion that this page's $\boldsymbol M\ddot{\boldsymbol q}+\boldsymbol C\dot{\boldsymbol q}=\boldsymbol\tau$ form expresses. - [free_floating_dynamics](free_floating_dynamics.md) — recovered from the *same* DeNOC model by leaving the base twist $\dot{\boldsymbol q}_0$ unactuated (zero base wrench), contrasting our free-flying use where $\dot{\boldsymbol q}_0$ is commanded. - [generalized_inertia_matrix](generalized_inertia_matrix.md) — the DeNOC produces $\boldsymbol M=\boldsymbol N_{\mathrm{voc}}^\top\boldsymbol M_{\mathrm{NE}}\boldsymbol N_{\mathrm{voc}}$ recursively in $\mathcal{O}(n)$. - [generalized_jacobian](generalized_jacobian.md) — the per-link horizontal slices $\boldsymbol J_i$ of $\boldsymbol N_{\mathrm{voc}}$ are the velocity Jacobians; the free-floating GJM is a further reduction folding momentum conservation. - [dynamic_coupling](dynamic_coupling.md) — the base–arm coupling block $\boldsymbol M_{0m}$ (source $H_{0m}$) is exactly the inertial coupling between arm motion and base reaction. ## Open Questions - The source presents one formulation for both regimes but its worked control example is the (free-floating) Desired/Zero Reaction Maneuver. What changes in the DeNOC-derived $\boldsymbol M,\boldsymbol C$ partition when the base is *actuated* (free-flying) — does the coupling block $\boldsymbol M_{0m}$ stop being a constraint and become a control channel? - The DeNOC gives the full coupled $\boldsymbol M$; how does this relate to Giordano's circumcentroidal split $\boldsymbol\Gamma$ that decouples the CoM from the attitude+EE block — is one a coordinate transform of the other?